Moreton Cheyney RF Repairs
General circuit tracing and
RF fault finding
|
|
I took a break from repairs
to the set and started to trace the circuit. I immediately realised
that some fairly extensive changes have been made by a previous
owner and in doing this there were a few bad solder joints that
may have resulted in the set being stood down from service. I
initially began in the rear corner of the receiver which is occupied
by an L63G (equivalent to the 6J5) and two metal 6J5 valves.
I had overlooked the fact that there is no trace of an output
transformer and no evidence of one having been fitted so I must
assume that the output transformer was supplied with the loudspeaker
which, from the 1946 Wireless World advert above, indicates it
was supplied only with those sets fitted in cabinets. The transformer
must have been fairly special because I cannot recall ever seeing
a pair of 6J5s being asked to supply 10 watts. The next thing
I spotted was that there are no direct connections between either
rear socket and the 6J5 anodes. There clearly should be something
and indeed I found a small condenser which I measured as about
4.7nF connecting one 6J5 anode to a pin on a rear socket. The
wiring to this particular 6J5 is a little odd in that both its
heater pins are wired, not to the sets LT line and ground, but
to the rear connector to which that condenser is wired. Maybe
this was done to reduce hum? Below, I've shown the area occupied
by the output valves.
In the picture below the resistors
are marked as follows: Individual anode feed 51Kohm, joint anode
feed 10Kohm, cathode 3.3Kohm (see notes below for what this means).
I'm guessing the functions of the two potentiometers.
I soon realised that to trace
the circuit of the whole receiver I'd need to assign reference
codes to the valves and components and you can see the results
below. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
Above is what I traced for the two
6J5 valves that were originally used for audio output which I
suspect have been modified in some way, as yet undetermined.
At first it looks like the left valve provides a single phase
output to a external amplifier via a pin on one of the two rear
5-way sockets. The change was either done by the manufacturer
or the user. I guess the external amplifier has a phase splitter
so that this one is redundant but further work is needed before
this is certain. If these two valves are supposed to directly
drive a pair of push-pull power output valves their output voltages
should be in anti-phase but they appear to be in-phase. It's
therefore possible that not only has one anode been grounded
it's possible a grid feed has been rewired, maybe as an interim
change not followed up? To see the amplifier
click the above circuit. Read on for some thoughts... |
|
|
Initially I assumed that this
chassis carried the complete receiver circuitry; although a couple
of important things are clearly missing ie. an audio output transformer
and a power supply. I assumed however that the statement about
the audio output being 10 watts push-pull with a maximum of 2%
distortion meant that two of the 6J5 valves were responsible
for this, but later, having found that none of the 6J5s were
wired for this I realised that either some later modifications
had been carried out, or more likely the audio output was carried
on a separate chassis and that this chassis also housed the mains
PSU.
Firstly, working at some theoretical
figures based on published information we can say that if the
push pull audio output is given as 10 watts and assuming this
is actually 10 watts RMS, then each 6J5 valve would need to deliver
5 watts of audio at max output. Assuming an efficiency of say
70%, each valve (because the max anode dissipation is 2.5 watts)
would draw about 7 watts. Given an HT rail of 300 volts each
valve would draw 23mA or from an HT rail of 250 volts, 28mA.
Taking an average an HT rail
of 275 volts each valve would draw 25mA.The valves have an auto-bias
cathode resistor of 3.3Kohm so the grid of each would be negatively
biased at 82 volts which seems rather odd. I would expect the
negative bias to be circa 4 to 6 volts so the cathode resistor
should be 160 to 240 ohms. I'm unsure about the anode resistors.
If they are original then they must have been fitted to protect
the valves when operated without their transformer. Looking at
the 3.3Kohm cathode resistors I can only assume that these were
fitted by the last owner so that the valves would be acting as
a driver for an external power amplifier. In that role an anode
current of between 1 and 2mA would be typical. Assuming an anode
current of 1.5mA the common 10Kohm would drop 30 volts (both
valves total 3mA) and each 51Kohm would drop 77 volts leaving
an anode voltage of about 170 volts which seems sensible.
Now the circuitry around the
ganged pots... I'm still not entirely clear about the purpose
of these two pots. Given a slight complexity in producing a decent
treble control these pots may be used for that function? |
 |
|
I've yet to trace these circuits,
but I did notice the left hand pot is wired to a large grounded
electrolytic. |
 |
|
Next steps: identify all
the components and trace the circuit diagram. This will help
to work out the purpose of the four mystery valves. There are
a few possible functions.. the TRF receiver, maybe an anode bend
detector, and a "loudness" amplifier. V12 and V13 look
like they are a pair of audio drivers for the PA fitted on the
amp/PSU chassis. A brief check of the wiring tells me only a
single audio feed is now wired to the output connectors and a
new phase splitter circuit fitted to the modified external amplifier.
See
the components listings which relate to the numbers shown on
the following four pictures
Note X1 and X2 noted in IFT4
can are copper oxide "Westector" diodes whose "6"
marking refers to the number of elements.
|
 |
 |
 |
This area is hidden under wiring
and parts and carries some of the AVC components connected with
white sleeved wires. |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Now that I've identified
99% of the components I can start to trace the circuit. Once
I started I soon found modifications made by the previous owner
plus a number of poor solder joints. I decided to find out the
actions of the bandwidth switch as this should lead me to the
TRF section of the receiver. The switch has four wafers spaced
widely apart and I discovered it needs switch cleaner treatment
as I found continuity tests didn't make sense. Each wafer has
a pair of single pole 5-way contacts. Starting at the wafer nearest
the front panel, one switch is not used and the other strangely
has all 5 contacts wired together.. so why bother with a switch?
The wiper goes to the HT line via R32 and the output contacts
to IFT1 where it is routed via the primary coil to the anode
of the mixer valve, V1.
The second wafer is where the
TRF receiver is switched in (this, I imagine is an anode bend
detector). 4 output contacts are wired together and route via
IFT2 primary coil to R30 to HT and the TRF contact wired to R13
which is the anode load resistor for V4. Therefore, this switch
removes HT from V6, the second IF amplifier and connects instead
to V4, presumably the TRF receiver valve. Again the other 5-way
switch is unused.
The third wafer has both 5-way
switches in use. One switch has its first position unused then
selects either R39, R40 or R41 which are wired together and connect
to the fifth switch position. Here we find a modification. One
of a pair of gold coloured wires connects to position 5 and the
second to the output contacts (which are all wired together)
of the other 5-way switch then are routed through a hole in the
front of the chassis. The wiper connections of both switches
are as yet untraced, however that combination of all 5 outputs
connects to pin 3 of V9. This valve was broken, but I believe
it to be a KTZ63, making pin 3 its anode. I've marked this as
a "Loudness" valve which is a modern term recently
given to enhancing speech.
The fourth wafer has both 5-way
switches used.One handles the normal bandwidth settings plus
an output for TRF and is associated with the Radio/Gram switch.
The wiper of the other 5-way switch connects to a condenser.
This is C27 wired to the anode of V9. Two other resistors are
wired to V9 anode viz. R51 and R48 (the anode load resistor for
V9). The normal bandwidth outputs for the 5-way switch connect
sequentially from R68 (to ground) to R33, R34 & R35. The
TRF position is not used. |
 |
|
Above is a first pass
at what I believe to have been the original receiver block diagram
I've assumed volume, bass, treble
and loudness are carried out at V9, V11, V12 and V13, but I'm
clueless about the existing circuitry.
AVC or Automatic Volume Control
is the feature which uses the detected carrier level to feed
back a negative bias voltage to earlier stages in the receiver
to maintain the carrier at a preset level. The carrier of any
broadcast station will produce an AC voltage at the last IF amplifier
which will be rectified by a diode whose anode produces a negative
voltage representing the signal strength of the station. A negative
voltage is used because this can readily be used to reduce the
gain of input amplifiers. In order for this to work certain of
the amplifier valves are variable mu types whose bias determines
their gain. Strictly speaking the feature should be termed AGC
or Automatic Gain Control because, in a receiver aimed at high
fidelity reception the audio output will not be fixed but should
be linearly passed through the receiver to produce exactly the
same audio output as exists in the broadcasted audio. I would
expect this receiver to have fast AGC so that gain is increased
instantaneously to combat any fading in the signal, hence I've
postulated an AVC amplifier (its old term). |
 |
RF Front End
Front end circuitry seems to be
fairly standard except that the wavechange switch selects a smaller
tuning condenser for the two higher frequency wavebands than
that used on the other three wavebands.
The coils are standard with the oscillator
having a tapped winding and the RF amplifier coils a tuned primary
with an untuned coupling coil.
From inductance measurements the IF
seems to be 465KHz.
Resistor R7 looks distressed and has
lost its banding. It measures far higher in value than I'd expect,
probably due to failure of condenser C49.
I suspect it should be 100 ohms? |
 |
TRF Receiver
V4 started off as a real puzzle. Some
connections were hidden by components but having sketched out
the wiring I realised that Pin 6 was a tie-off point and not
a weird valve electrode. The valve in this position was either
a KTW63 or KTZ63 and is wired as a very interesting cathode-follower
triode.
The anode current is set to a very low
value giving the valve a large reverse grid bias. For example
with an anode current of 1/4mA the grid bias would be minus 25
volts.
The RF input from the tuned mixer input
is rectified by anode-bend characteristics and filtered by R12/C7/C10
and passed to the receiver audio amplifier via DC blocking condenser
C8. The anode circuit is grounded to RF by C37 and C74.
This receive mode is selected on the
front wafer of the bandwidth switch where IF stages 2 & 3
(V6 & V7) are deselected at the same time as HT is applied
to V4. |
 |
Complete RF Front End (less switching)
Putting the two front-end circuits together,
here's a schematic. There's a fair bit of switching involved
in coil and bandwidth selection which I've omitted for simplicity.
At this point I hadn't spotted a provision
for AFC, reported in a Wireless World article to have been used
in the "Silver Dragon". If it's there it may be located
within the coil switching circuitry?
Otherwise, logically if there is no
AFC, my example must be a "Silver Knight" rather than
a "Silver Dragon". |
|
|
Next I'll re-install the
repaired variable bandwidth IFTs, rewire them, sort out the various
broken solder joints and the bent trimmers mentioned earlier.
IFT1 and IFT3 had two and one
0.05uF wax condensers respectively; in my listing C59/C60 &
C64. Testing these with a 200Kohm series resistor put about 30
volts across each condenser with an HT set at 300 volts. I noticed
that this voltage, in all three cases, rose continuously at a
very slow rate (about 0.1 volt per 5 seconds). This may mean
that the inside of the condenser has some dampness which is slowly
evaporating from heating due to the leakage current. Whatever
is happening the basic leakage through the old condensers is
way too high at around 1mA (making the the condenser the equivalent
of a 22Kohm resistor).The final test was to measure the capacitance
of the three condensers which was 0.15uF to 0.2uF instead of
the marked 0.05uF. I fitted three new capacitors marked 0.047uF
x 250VAC, rewired the IFTs where the old 18SWG wires connecting
to external circuitry had perished insulation, then screwed them
back on the chassis. I'll delay resetting the cams which currently
are pushed out of the way until I'm ready to align the IF strip.
One problem I met in fitting
IFT1 and IFT3 was probably also encountered when the receiver
was in production. IFT1 was OK but IFT3 had a jammed plunger
once it had been reassembled. The adjusting screws for the upper
coil mounting plate are inaccesible so I'll need to adjust this
with fine-nosed pliers to set the dust core perfectly parallel
to the hole in the coil. Once the coils were mounted perfectly
in-line the plunger was able to move without jamming.
Now to tackle the various broken
solder joints and those bent trimmers... The damage has resulted
from the chassis being rested on something other than a flat
surface. Ideally the underside of the chassis should have been
fitted with a metal plate. Fortunately nothing was actually broken,
just bent and I was able to twist the trimmers back in place.
A couple of coils have been detached from their mounting brackets
but as they are held in place by wiring this is not important. |
 |
QAVC Amplifier and Audio detector
I looked at the circuitry around the
socket in the corner of the chassis which didn't have a valve
in place when I got the receiver. I initially thought that the
socket was wired for a double diode triode, so based on the other
valves will be a DH63, but later I spotted that Pin 6 was not
a tie-off point but a feed for g2 so revised my idea and nominated
a 6B8 (a double-diode pentode) because this is the only valve
whose connections match the wiring and components. The circuit
is not especially recognisable and is probably some sort of AVC
amplifier rather than a signal detector and LF amplifier. As
voltage gain is not really needed in that application the valve
is wired as a cathode follower which essentially provides a lot
more current than the usual AVC diode. The cathode feed of the
6B8 includes a preset potentiometer (located in the rear corner
of the chassis) which also sets the grid bias of the second IF
amplifier valve. I guessed this control is used to preset the
maximum overall gain to minimise distortion on very strong signals.
In other words arrange for AVC action to be linear and not result
in saturation from high level signals thus preventing insufficient
negative feedback.
Later I suspected it has something to
do with the QAVC feature which I describe later. In that respect
the preset control may be for inter-station muting?
There may be a few errors in the circuit
shown. but a revised version is to be found further down this
page within the IF amplifier circuit diagram. |
|
 |
Audio Pre-Amplifier
After another session of peering into
the wiring I came up with this circuit. The switch marked QAVC
off/Radio/Gram is a four pole 3-way affair with a long extension
made of tufnol which is not entirely suitable (like the ones
used for tone controls) because it flexes giving a wobbly feeling
to switching. Also, because the switch is fairly stiff the knob
has twisted over use and its securing screws have made a deep
gouge in the tufnol (below).
Of interest is V9 which must operate
with a very low anode current (circa 1 or 2mA). Oddly its heater
connections (x, y) are not wired to the remainder of the valves,
instead being brought out to one of the two 5-way chassis connectors.
V9 appears to be an audio pre-amp (maybe fitted to work with
a gramophone deck using a very low output) and it's possible
its heater is provided from a 6 volt DC supply to minimise hum? |
 |
|
|
|
Just a passing thought..
what exactly is "QAVC off" (engraved on the mode selector
knob)?
Looking this up it stands for
a rarely used term "Quiet Automatic Volume Control".
Ordinary AVC must be noisy? Then again, delayed AVC is common
so could the Q stand for "Quick"? AVC is used to maintain
the same audio level from the speaker for different broadcasts
which is what a cultured listener wants.
Fast AVC would indeed be noisy
when tuning across the band, and when a strong station fades
out and background noise pops up so I guess this receiver uses
another form of AVC (ie. QAVC) which can be switched to normal
AVC for night time listening or searching for weak stations.
One common AVC feature is its amount of "hang". Tuning
to a strong station puts a large negative bias on the RF and
IF amplifier valves and adding capacitance to the line carrying
the voltage will result in a time delay for this to discharge.
Tuning away from the strong station will result, not in an instantaneous
rise in audio from the signal skirts and background noise, but
will make the transition more gentle which could be what is possibly
meant by "quiet". Another form of AVC known as "delayed
AVC" is when the AVC rectifier is reverse biased so that
a feedback voltage is only developed once a pre-determined carrier
level is tuned. The receiver will amplify signals at the maximum
amount until the carrier gets to say S6, then the feedback comes
into effect to reduce the overall gain.
Once I've understood the whole of the
receiver circuit and the dry joints and squashed connections
have been tidied up, plus maybe changing some of the wiring to
plastic where the original insulation is in poor condition, I
could fit a set of valves and apply 6.3 volts for the heaters
then carefully apply an increasing HT voltage and monitor any
leakage. It may even be possible to work out the function of
the various controls before starting on component changes?
I replaced a few wire links that had
cracked or missing insulation with plastic covered wire (I use
the stuff from old computer power supplies as it has a decent
voltage rating), then straightened the bent RF trimmers. Without
any valves plugged in I applied 105 volts to the HT line. Initially
the current was 30 to 40mA but this soon dropped to around 15mA
after there was a faint pop from somewhere down in the audio
section.. but no smoke. I measured the voltages at the valve
anode pins after the current had settled down with the following
results. I've noted the likely leaky component where I've already
traced a circuit. V6 appears to have a s/c condenser or an open
circuit IF coil (I found later that I had missed soldering new
HT and AVC control wires when I'd refitted the repaired IFT).
V4 has very high value anode resistor which will accentuate the
effect of any leaky condenser. V5 has a new capacitor at C24
(hence the correct voltage). The voltage regulator, V3 feeds
several screen grids plus the local oscillator and C15, C19,
C21 and C75 will all contribute to HT leaks. |
|
VALVE |
V1a |
V2 |
V3 |
V4 |
V5 |
V6 |
V7 |
V8 |
V9 |
V10 |
V11 |
V12 |
V13 |
|
Anode volts |
42 |
100 |
97 |
1.5 |
105 |
0.3 |
100 |
46 |
87 |
82 |
68 |
98 |
98 |
|
Expected |
105 |
105 |
105 |
105 |
105 |
105 |
105 |
105 |
105 |
105 |
105 |
105 |
105 |
|
Leaky |
C21 |
C49 |
various |
C37/C74 |
C24 |
C59 |
C72 |
C14 |
C27 |
C79 |
C42 |
C29 |
C29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Does this receiver have AFC
(Automatic Frequency Control)? At this point I decided to look
for a treatise on AFC and found exactly what I was looking for.
In fact I wouldn't be at all surprised if the Moreton Chayney
designers hadn't themselves used this very book in their design
of the Silver Dragon. It was written in 1937 and explores circuits
used in contemporary receivers. Click
the dial above to read this very informative book.
Once I'd looked at established
AFC circuits a couple of puzzling facts may have become resolved
(but maybe a "red herring"). The previous day I was
tracing the circuitry of the IF strip and thinking it was straightforward
sketched a general circuit from which to identify the components.
When I looked at IFT4 I found something odd and also in IFT2
I found something else that was puzzling. IFT2 has grid connections
to not one, but two valves, V6 and V7. One connection looks normal,
feeding V6 from the IF transformer secondary coil, but the other
to V7 has a small condenser feeding from the anode of the IF
amplifier V5.
IFT4 includes the two miniature
Westectors (X1 and X2) which I'd initially assumed were for AVC
and AM detection but I now realise that these might form part
of a discriminator. V5 and V6 are standard IF amplifiers but
V7 could be a discriminator used for AFC. Time to re-check the
circuit of the mixer valve and look for a connection to the oscillator
grid. Another puzzle is also resolved. I found at V7, a KTZ63
which I thought strange as it is not a variable mu pentode and
would be unsuited in a standard IF strip because it would not
be controlled by the AVC line. I've now amended the block diagram
but I'm still unsure of its accuracy. Back to circuit tracing...
In the corner of the chassis is a valve socket whose valve was
missing no doubt because it's in a vulnerable position and had
been smashed. I initially thought it might have been a DH63,
double diode triode but the socket has pin 6 used. Clearly not
an anchor point as is customary with the likes of the 6K7 etc
because only a 1K resistor plus a decoupling condenser are present.
The only valve type that fits is the 6B8 which has identical
connections to the DH63 plus g2. Pins 4 and 5 are wired together
and the anode at pin 3 and g2 at pin 6 are fed by 1K resistors.
The anode is decoupled to ground by a 4uF condenser meaning that
the valve function is that of a cathode follower. This, in practical
terms, means that the normal AVC voltage is produced across a
low impedance and therefore able to supply much more current
than a standard AVC diode rectifier.
Given a combined anode and screen
current of say 13mA the cathode voltage will be 4.68 volts. As
the diode anodes rectify an AM carrier the current will increase
say by 5mA resulting in a new cathode voltage of 6.48 volts.
After much puzzling and a review
of traced circuitry, I decided that AFC is not a feature in this
example, but instead I'm looking at inter-station muting.. called
QAVC. Below is what I've discovered to-date, suitably marked
up to indicate what's going on. |
|
 |
|
Above is the latest revised
circuit diagram for the IF amplifiers. The area around IFT4 is
tricky to trace because the underside of the transformer is masked
by a resistor tagboard. Westectors X1 and X2 are the diodes connected
to V7 anode and the transformer secondary. The earthy side of
IFT3 secondary carries demodulated audio (rectified by V8 diodes),
and filtered to remove the RF (believed to be 465KHz).
If this is the version of the
receiver that has AFC then this may be associated with V7 and
its two Westectors. This area is still being checked but the
tangle of components and partly concealed wiring is making things
difficult. There are six connections plus ground originating
from within the IFT4 can and I had to buzz them out to determine
where they went. I now realise that the designer has been quite
(slightly) kind... white sleeving is AVC and the like, red is
HT+, dark maroon is 150v, green is usually audio, blue is local
oscillator and oddments such as audio valve anode wiring, and
black is ground. Yellow screened wire is used for critical anode
connections and valve heaters (slightly confusing!).
Whilst I was tracing the AVC
connections I spotted a concealed wire carrying the 150 volt
stabilised supply, so stabilised HT isn't confined to circuits
at the rear of the chassis, but also to the mixer and possibly
the screen of the RF amplifier.
Now that the circuit is becoming
more complete, you can see that the two Westectors are for AVC
plus QAVC and the 6B8 diodes for audio. No AFC seems to be provided,
unless I've missed the method by which the local oscillator is
adjusted. Looking at the key passive components: R49 and R50
set the amount of AVC delay and VR5 is used to preset the action
of QAVC. Audio is extracted from the AM carrier by V8's diodes
and filtered via a low pass filter C68-R83-C69 . The job of V7
is to amplify the IF signal purely for providing AVC and QAVC
and you'll note that the gain of this valve is not governed by
feedback; being a KTZ63 which does not have variable mu characteristics.
So how does V8 work? You'll notice that there's a link between
V8 and V6 via their shared cathode resistor R23, so V8 bias will
be partly governed by V6 and vice versa. V8 pentode is a QAVC
amplifier designed for interstation muting and it's linked to
volume control because its two integral diodes will be controlled
by its cathode voltage. V8 grid is driven by the RF voltage produced
by the AVC-controlled RF amplifier and mixer plus the first two
IF stages V5 and V6. Setting aside QAVC (or switching it off)
will result in Westector X2 controlling the gain of the receiver.
X2 is reverse biased by R49/R50 which places about 7.5 volts
(assuming an HT of 250 volts and zero diode leakage) on the diode
cathode and will only conduct if its anode voltage is greater
then about 8 volts so any AVC action will be delayed until a
strong signal is tuned in. This means that the receiver gain
is pretty high when no signals are tuned so inter-station noise
level will be pretty loud so the designers introduced QAVC. Once
QAVC is turned on the audio level will now be dependent on the
biasing of the V8 diodes. "QAVC off" places a ground
at V8 cathode but when that ground is removed, when "QAVC
off" is deselected, V8 cathode rises to a voltage governed
by its anode and screen currents and somewhat modified by the
cathode current of V6 (controlled by normal AVC). With QAVC in
operation V8 cathode voltage is always positive with respect
to ground and Westector X1 will be turned off unless the RF voltage
across IFT4 secondary exceeds a certain level. V8's diodes will
also be turned off until the voltage across IFT3 secondary reaches
a certain level. With V8's diodes turned off the receiver will
be muted and only unmuted for strong signals which turn back
on V8's diodes. Because of component variations and variations
in HT voltage, the designers fitted VR5 which sets the quiescent
current for V8 and hence the quieting level. That level dictates
the strength of the weakest station for which the receiver will
produce audio output with QAVC active. Note the common earth
return resistor mentioned above which couples together V6 and
V8. Because we are looking at decoupled voltages the AVC and
QAVC lines are interdependent because the currents drawn by V6
and V8 will add together arithmetically if QAVC is active. If
QAVC is turned off you'll note that the ground return for V6
is provided by R23 and R24 but V8 plays no part in V6 biasing
because its cathode is grounded. In this state V8 diodes are
no longer reverse biased and provide audio through R72 controlled
only by normal AVC. |
 |
|
Next I'll attempt to trace
the remaining circuitry around V9-V11. Easier said than done
however because of the way the set had been built by adding parts
on top of wiring. For example the ganged volume controls VR3/VR4
(if that's what they are?) have been fitted over the top of several
resistors and part of V10 valveholder. Wiring also passes into
and under the rear component tag board masking connections and
a couple of resistors. With some difficulty I managed to see
the connections to V10 which had a KTZ63 fitted when I received
the set. I noticed first that although Pin 3 looked to have typical
anode components, Pin 6 had a resistor R63 and 4uF decoupling
(block) condenser C75. Is this a tie-off point? It looks not
because the resistor goes to HT+ and the condenser to ground
with nothing else wired to the pin so it appears to be a g2 connection.
What about Pin 4? That's wired to Pin 5 and then goes off somewhere.
This is much like I'd found at V8 which cannot be anything other
than a 6B8. V10 then must also be a 6B8 as this is the only valve
whose connections match the wiring and that KTZ63 would not have
worked very well plugged into V10's holder. Hidden under C42,
that large yellow condenser I discovered an 0.05uF wax condenser
(now C79) wired from V10 anode to V11 grid. At least V11 does
seem to be an L63 (the valve that was plugged into V11's socket...
and substantially similar to the 6J5) because of its connections..
although it's a very strange L63 because its anode is substantially
decoupled to ground via the 4uF yellow condenser C42 and the
620 ohm cathode resistor R61 plus the 1Mohm grid leak R80 are
wired, not to directly to ground, but to ground via a 47Kohm
2 watt resistor R69. This means that V11 is a cathode follower
and must be running at a very low anode current to avoid non-linearity.
I'm assuming V10 and V11 are
audio amplifiers and therefore their output is through the brown
wire to C45, that chunky 0.5uF condenser, in series with VR3
via that green-sleeved wire. That then dives off towards what
I believe must be the treble and bass tone controls. The green
sleeving is consistent.. green=audio.
Bringing down a copy of V9 from
above and the latest on the right....as I discover more I'll
update the circuits below...
Can you
spot any mistakes here? |
 |
VR3 and VR4 are ganged together. |
|
|
Below
is the second attempt at the full audio circuitry. There are
several puzzling features, some of which may be because the last
owner carried out modifications. Of course there's a possibility
the receiver never did leave the factory fully inspected and
tested, leaving the last owner to try and fix it.
Because some of the connections
are hidden behind components I made a few mistakes. The connection
at the chassis end of C42 for example actually went to the junction
of a pair of 120Kohm resistors, not to ground. Plus... somewhere
in the wiring there must be a ground return for V10 grid leak?
The circuit below, around the
components R77, R66, R65, R76, R67 etc looks very odd, perhaps
because a chassis connection is missing? Once this is added the
components will form two separate circuits viz. the input to
V10 grid from V9 and self bias for V10. But what action do the
two diodes within V10 perform? |
 |
|
Below... here's a puzzle. Through a
hole in the front of the chassis is a twisted flex with gold
coloured insulation.. clearly a modification. I guess the guy
that did this is no longer with us, but he seems to have made
a mistake. The left switch is now disconnected but the right
hand switch has been messed up.Working out what was happening
then figuring out what was intended is necessary in order to
re-establish the original MC circuit.
The switch wiper connects via a blue
wire to V10 anode and the 18Kc + TRF contacts go to V9 anode.
Was the intention to carry V9 and V10 anodes out to the front
for headphones? That way you could listen to either audio output?
But... only if one didn't switch to the 18Kc and TRF settings.
In those settings V9 anode would be connected to V10 anode. "NC"
means there's no connection but two tags (left and lower) carry
solder so were used in the past. Wafer 4/2 carries an arrangement
of resistors is possibly designed for various settings of top
cut, but if so, are they the wrong way round (more top cut for
5Kc would need the resistors 1M and 120K to be reversed)? These
are R33/34/35/68 with C27. Two more puzzles are evident. First,
V10 anode current passes through V10 anode resistor and this
connection is decoupled to ground. |
 |
|
The bandwidth switch has 4 wafers
each carrying two switches.Wafers 1 and 2 each have only a single
switch used, but wafers 3 and 4 use both switches. Their tags
are not positioned entirely logically and are easy to confuse.
I think the last owner carried out a
modification and misread the tags.
Maybe the left switch was originally
connected to V9 anode and perhaps connected to the grid of V10
via a condenser and a grid leak with the selected resistor arranged
as a potentiometer for reducing signal level. The right switch
may have had a top cut circuit for V10, perhaps carrying two
condensers to ground, one for 8/11/15Kc and the other for 18Kc/TRF?
Looking at the fairly complete audio
circuit you'll notice that there is no output from V9 to V10
so the above suggestion does make sense, almost as if the two
blue wires from V9 and V10 anodes were confused? |
|
|
My aim is to put the Moreton Cheyney
circuit back to its original state and see how it performs. I'll
be fitting modern parts as necessary because these will have
much the same characteristics as the original parts when they
were brand new, and being generally physically smaller in size
will let me see more of the hidden areas. I'm fairly sure some
mid 1950s parts already replace those from the 1940s. From the
disposition of parts I think the various sub-assemblies were
made perhaps by local workers who were supplied with drawings
and sets of parts. This would explain why for example, Sprague
0.1uF and 0.05uF condensers are used in some areas but wax covered
types and the odd Hunts types are used elsewhere. Dividing testing
to RF/IF then just audio may be the best approach because not
many changes seem to have been carried out in the former but
there are lots of changes in the latter.
Here are some puzzling features that
need resolution.
The circuit for
the output valves does not make sense.
Maybe the two 4700pF condensers should be connected together
or, depending on the following amplifier, brought out to separate
pins on the 5-way chassis connector?
Bandwidth switch
wafer set 3 circuitry is wrong.
V10 circuitry
looks very odd & What is
the function of V10s diodes and was it a 6B8 as I guessed or
something different?
Should V11 be
a phase splitter? My guess is
no.
And why are some audio valve heaters
brought out to a different supply source.. was this to reduce
hum by feeding these with DC rather than AC? No, after examining
the matching amplifier and power supply it seems a few valve
heaters are fed from a second AC heater supply. |
.jpg) |
Click the picture to
see the latest full circuit diagram. A few bits to be added (magic
eye and 0D3 circuit) and some checking around the switches and
AVC lines. |
|
 |
I'm close to fitting the
RF and IF valves to see if this section of the receiver is serviceable.
Initially I changed the two large condensers inside IFT4. These
are marked 0.1uF x 600V. One drew 4mA at 200V and measured 193nF..
the other drew 0.4mA at 200V and measured 160nF. I fitted
two new 0.22uF x 275VAC capacitors because these fitted better
mechanically than smaller types.
What exactly do these leakage
values mean in practice. As the test voltage was changed it was
apparent that the leakages were basically resistive. One condenser
had a resistance of 50Kohm and the other 500Kohm and its job
in the receiver circuit will detemine its effect. The worst one
was decoupling the anode of V7 and the other smooths the voltage
providing delayed AVC at the cathode of X2. Taking the latter..
this condenser is in parallel with a 3.3Kohm resistor and is
fed by 250 volts of HT via 100Kohm. Its effect is to reduce the
value of the 3.3Kohm resistor by less than 4%. Bearing in mind
the 3.3Kohm resistor will read high because of its age, the leaky
condenser will actually counteract the higher than optimum AVC
delay voltage.. or you might say it has negligible effect. The
anode voltage decoupler will draw HT current in parallel with
that drawn by V7 anode and will reduce the anode voltage of V7
from 220 to 195 volts. Again, the 6.2Kohm anode resistor will
be higher than the marked value from aging, so in this case the
leaky condenser will make matters worse but the difference in
the voltage will be insignificant; however in both cases the
old condensers would not be too reliable and likely to get worse
rather than better, although they are much better than the typical
wax covered variety. |
|
|
Connecting 300V
across the HT line and chassis resulted in a current of about
33mA so the majority of the old condensers are not too bad. Previously
I'd applied 105 volts and seen 15mA HT current. I'll repeat the
table shown earlier, but before I did this I decided to look
at the matching amplifier so I could figure out the audio section
of the receiver. I reduced the HT to about 250 volts and monitored
the current. This slowly deceased until it read 20mA, and I checked
the valve anodes and screen voltages.. below.
Much later after lots of component
changes I measured the voltages again and some of the results
are definitely iffy. I've used generic valve types but some are
KTW/Z series. It looks like there are a few anomalies. Some voltages
i didn't check and the HT used was about 280 volts. The HT current
during the later test at 280 volts was something like 60mA. The
valves account for about 45mA with some guesses marked *. Condenser
leakages probably account for 10 to 20mA. |
|
VALVE |
V1a |
V2 |
V3 |
V4 |
V5 |
V6 |
V7 |
V8 |
V9 |
V10 |
V11 |
V12 |
V13 |
|
Anode volts |
250 |
250 |
250 |
92 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
236 |
115 |
217 |
217 |
- |
- |
|
Expected |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
250 |
- |
- |
|
Leaky |
C21 |
C49 |
various |
C37/C74 |
C24 |
C59 |
C72 |
C14 |
C27 |
C79 |
C42 |
C29 |
C29 |
|
LATER |
6K8 |
6K7 |
0D3 |
6J7 |
6K7 |
6K7 |
6K7 |
6B8 |
6K7 |
6B8 |
6J5 |
6J5 |
6J5 |
|
Anode volts |
258 |
257 |
127 |
156 |
260 |
273 |
253 |
190 |
30 |
30 |
243 |
129 |
134 |
|
screen volts |
93 |
123 |
na |
156 |
29 |
24 |
163 |
125 |
64 |
- |
na |
na |
na |
|
cathode volts |
2 |
1.0 |
na |
2 |
0.235 |
2.1 |
5.9 |
1.4 |
3.7 |
0 |
63.9 |
5.2 |
5.4 |
|
current mA |
7 |
3 |
15 |
5* |
0.5 |
2 |
5 |
1* |
1 |
1* |
1 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
|
|
|
The amplifier is driven from
two audio signals suitable for driving the output valves in push-pull
rather than a single feed to be later phase split. These are
fed from the rear of the receiver at Socket P2, pins 3 and 4
with pin 5 grounded. Socket P1 carries HT (pin 3) and heater
voltages (Pins 2 and 4 plus 1 and 5) with ground at pin 1. |
 |
|
I decided to test some
aspects of the receiver before going further. Since the HT leakage
wasn't too bad I plugged in a set of RF valves and the regulator.
These were V1, V2, V3, V5, V6, and V7. The HT current read around
50mA but dropped to 40mA as tests proceeded (note that some of
this current will be due to V3 the voltage regulator. I immediately
found that the heater supply of V5 was missing which limited
testing somewhat. Injecting 465KHz at the anode pin of V5 through
a capacitor, and grounding the input via 100 ohms to protect
the signal generator, proved I could tune the IF transformer
trimmers nearest the chassis edge to peak the signal. I discovered
the inboard trimmer at IFT4 had a broken slot so I had to re-cut
this with a small hacksaw. Turning to the front-end, I found
that the local oscillator would only run with the tuning condensers
at minimum capacity, and on only two wavebands. Typically I measured
2.87MHz at 510mV on one and 30MHz at 94mV on the other. On these
bands the signal rapidly dropped in ampitude as the tuning condenser
capacity was increased. Applying 465KHz to the top cap of V1
but not at the top cap of V2 brought up a signal at the top cap
of V5.
Next I'll trace the reason for
V5 not heating up and check generally for bad soldering in the
IF strip. As it was awkward monitoring a signal at IFT4 I'll
add V8 which carries the audio detector diodes and monitor B/W
switch wafer 4/1 for audio. I'll also add V4 which should give
me a shortcut to the state of the RF stage, V2, as this is the
TRF anode bend detector. V5 wasn't heating up because the valve
holder sockets were not gripping the valve pins. I bent the heater
sockets inwards but it worked for only a short time so I removed
the old socket and fitted a better quality octal holder. After
a lot of testing I noticed the HT current had drifted up to around
75mA from the original 40mA. I traced this (helped by a burning
smell from R7) to the anode circuit of the RF amplifier. I snipped
off the decoupling condenser but found it was OK and discovered
it was one of the anode coils (either medum or long wave coil)
which intermittently measured around 60 ohms to ground. Snipping
the link between medium wave coil and the short-wave coils removed
the intermittent short.
Checking the local oscillator,
it seems only to be working on the 2nd short-wave band at around
2.7MHz so all is not well with the 6K8. |
|
Checking for an intermittent
short in the RF coil area I found an open circuit coil in the
set connecting to the anode of the RF amplifier. I managed to
remove this although, because its fixing screw was directly underneath
one of the tuning condensers, it wasn't easy. The coil turned
out to be a standard Wearite part marked PHF2. I then noticed
that all the coils carried Wearite labels.
The coupling winding was open
circuit and had 52 turns of enamelled copper wire measuring 0.13mm
in diameter. This will be either 39 or 40 gauge. It has a max
current capacity of about 30mA. The limiting resistor is R7 which
is 10Kohm and fed from 250 volts will result in a current flow
of 25mA to ground. The point where the wire is open circuit has
a green patch of verdigris at the hole where the wire passed
through the former and being slightly corroded reduced its current
handling. |
 |
|
|
I had trouble finding
a suitable chart of enamelled wire information so I've copied
details below for reference. Note that the resistance reading
is per metre of wire at a temperature of 20 degrees Centigrade
and, as there are several types of enamelled coating, you may
find actual measurements for diameter are greater or less than
those shown by around 10%. For example the coupling winding for
the Wearite coil above had a measured diameter of 0.135mm but
was still 40SWG. |
|
SWG |
Cross Sectional Area |
Resistance |
Diameter |
|
14 |
3.49mm² |
0.00532 |
2.108mm |
|
16 |
2.086mm² |
0.00831 |
1.63mm |
|
18 |
1.169mm² |
0.0148 |
1.22mm |
|
20 |
0.6567mm² |
0.0263 |
0.914mm |
|
22 |
0.3973mm² |
0.0434 |
0.711mm |
|
24 |
0.2453mm² |
0.0703 |
0.558mm |
|
26 |
0.1641mm² |
0.105 |
0.457mm |
|
28 |
0.1109mm² |
0.155 |
0.376mm |
|
30 |
0.0779mm² |
0.221 |
0.315mm |
|
32 |
0.0591mm² |
0.292 |
0.274mm |
|
34 |
0.0428mm² |
0.402 |
0.234mm |
|
36 |
0.0292mm² |
0.589 |
0.193mm |
|
38 |
0.0182mm² |
0.945 |
0.152mm |
|
40 |
0.0117mm² |
1.48 |
0.122mm |
|
|
I wound 52 turns of 40SWG enamelled
wire onto the coil former. I had to do this by "scramble-winding"
rather than the original method which is wound at a slight angle,
first a group of turns one way then the other. Mine will probably
have more self-capacity but being a coupling winding shouldn't
be a problem.
After fitting the repaired
coil I noticed a bare wire close by almost touching the metal
shaft of the wavechange switch, almost certainly the cause of
the intermittent short circuit that most likely damaged the medium
wave coil. Before carrying out testing I replaced three wax 0.1uF
condensers, C48 and C52 (AVC decoupling) and C49 (coupling coil
decoupler).
Turning on the power I experimented
with applying signals to the RF front end. I found the local
oscillator would only run when the tuning condenser was set within
the top third of full mesh. There seemed to be no connection
between the aerial input and the RF stage, but by connecting
a signal generator to the top cap of the RF stage with the grid
lead not fixed in place, I managed to see RF at the first IF
stage. By experimenting I tuned the local oscillator to about
1.25MHz and found a signal of 785KHz produced an IF signal of
465KHz. This was present at the anode of the 2nd IF amplifier
so the receiver mixer and IF stages are working to some extent.
Tuning the dial I found I could peak the IF signal, but transferring
the input from the top cap to the aerial input and replacing
the top cap clip failed to produce anything at all. Something
is clearly wrong in the grid circuit of the RF amplifier or perhaps
there's a missing connection to an electrode of the 6K7.
The next step is to find out
why there is no connection between the RF input circuits and
the RF amplifier, or alternatively what's wrong with the RF amplifier.
Once this has been sorted out I'll investigate the lack of oscillation
in the mixer. I'm using a triode hexode 6K8 (similar to an ECH35)
but the original valve may have been something like a heptode
such as 6A8 (similar to an X63). |
|
I resolved the lack of
amplification through the RF stage. I had the top caps for the
RF amplifier V2 and the mixer V1 reversed. The various grid leads
are quite long and easily confused. Having corrected this the
RF amplifier worked after a fashion. Only one waveband is working,
namely medium waves and that only over two thirds of the tuning
range from the LF end. The lowest frequency tunes about 800KHz
resulting in a decent IF response set at 465KHz which is odd
because it should be 545KHz. To respond to 800KHz the oscillator
needs to be either 800KHz + 465KHz or 800KHz-465KHz equating
to either 1265KHz or 335KHz; clearly the former. The local oscillator
fails to run on any other waveband and looking at the padder
for the MW oscillator it looks very odd because it's made up
from a small (unmarked but low value) condenser in series with
three others in parallel. Either someone has attempted to alter
the coverage or attempted to replace the original. One option
is to remove these and measure the value, but I remembered using
a GDO for testing tuned circuits, so rather than swap this odd
padder, I'll see if it produces the correct frequency range.
Wearite oscillator coil data is listed below assuming an IF of
465KHz. Something is clearly wrong, but then again.. what value
tuning condenser and what value padders were assumed when Wearite
made the coils?
Later
I found a datasheet and copied
details from this into the tables below, adding extra info. *
For completeness I've added PO6/PO7/PA6/PA7 which are not used
in this receiver. As the original document wasn't very clear
some numbers may be wrong. I understand the tuning condensers
for both RF and oscillator are 500pF. Obviously, in the Moreton
Cheyney there are two tuning condensers, one of which is used
for the three lowest frequency bands and the smaller for the
two higher bands. This means that the coils for the two upper
bands will have trouble tracking and the oscillator padders will
most likely have been changed to match the dial markings. PA
and PH coils can be assumed roughly equal. |
|
OSC COIL |
INDUCTANCE |
COVERAGE
METERS |
COVERAGE
KHz/MHz |
OSC FREQ
HIGH |
OSC FREQ
LOW |
TRIMMER |
OSC PADDER |
|
PO1 |
390uH |
700-2000m |
429-150KHz |
894KHz-615KHz |
not feasible |
75pF |
150pF |
|
PO2 |
85uH |
200-557m |
1500-538KHz |
1.97MHz-1.00MHz |
not feasible |
76pF |
450pF |
|
PO5 |
4uH |
34-100m |
8.8MHz-3MHz |
9.26MHz-3MHz |
8.33MHz-2.53MHz |
60pF |
2400pF |
|
PO3 |
1.15uH |
16-47m |
18.75MHz-6.4MHz |
19.21MHz-6.86MHz |
18.28-5.93MHz |
50pF |
5000pF |
|
PO4 |
0.5uH |
12-35m |
25MHz-8.57MHz |
25.465MHz-9.03MHz |
24.53-8.10MHz |
60pF |
5000pF |
|
PO6 * |
27.45uH |
91-261m |
3.3MHz- 1.15MHz |
3.765MHz- 1.515MHz |
2.835MHz- 1.05MHz |
65pF |
900pF |
|
PO7 * |
44.2uH |
250-750m |
1200KHz- 400KHz |
1665KHz-865KHz |
not feasible |
73pF |
350pF |
|
RECEIVER
WAVEBAND |
DIAL READINGS |
RF COIL |
INDUCTANCE |
COVERAGE
METERS |
COVERAGE
KHz/MHz |
TRIMMER |
|
RANGE 5 |
800m-1900m |
PA1 |
2200uH |
700-2000m |
429-150KHz |
72pF |
|
RANGE 4 |
200m-550m |
PA2 |
170uH |
200-557m |
1500-538KHz |
65pF |
|
RANGE 3 |
40m-100m |
PA5 |
5.5uH |
34-100m |
8.8MHz-3MHz |
60pF |
|
RANGE 2 |
20m-34m |
PA3 |
1.2uH |
16-47m |
18.75MHz-6.4MHz |
55pF |
|
RANGE 1 |
10m-17m |
PA4 |
0.5uH |
12-35m |
25MHz-8.57MHz |
60pF |
|
NA |
|
PA6 * |
27.45uH |
91-261m |
3.3MHz- 1.15MHz |
60pF |
|
NA |
|
PA7 * |
44.2uH |
250-750m |
1200KHz- 400KHz |
60pF |
|
From the dial reading
column you can see that some wavebands do not correlate with
the coil specifications. The dial is calibrated fairly well on
LW, MW and SW3 (Ranges 5, 4 and 3) but on the top ranges it's
not very accurately calibrated, showing mainly the SW broadcast
bands and major broadcast stations. As far as precise alignment
is concerned, not all coils are fitted with dust cores and rely
solely on trimmers for setting up so there may be some vagueness
in the finished dial accuracy. |
|
|
During the initial tests I connected
headphones (via a capacitor) to various points in the circuit
that were easy to access and found that the cathode of V8 provided
a good audio signal (the tone from my signal generator). I initially
thought this was because the AM detector is the pair of diodes
at V8, but this was incorrect. There should not have been any
audio at V8 cathode, but there was, because condenser C13 which
is supposed to filter out any audio was open circuit. I removed
C13, C14, and snipped C15. I fitted new condensers at these positions
but of course I'll need to find a new convenient point at which
to temporarily monitor audio so, time to fit V9, the audio preamp
and listen to the test signal a little better than before. In
fact the signal to which I was listening was being provided not
by the AM demodulator diodes at V8, but by the action of X1 (the
QAVC detector).
Note that the purpose of V8
is to amplify the AVC in order to set the QAVC level. I did notice
that IFT4 which provides the RF voltage for AVC tuned nicely
to 465KHz so at least that part of the circuit seems to be working,
and the lack of C13 action enabled me to conveniently check IFT4
tuning.
In progress... things to sort
out (1) V1 local oscillator and (2) some IFT trimmers are not
peaking the 465KHz signal. The bandwidth switch appears to work
and the TRF receiver setting does cut off IF amplification so
I could also plug in V4 and see how well this functions. I tried
this and it's not working, or at least the audio level is too
weak to hear in my test headphones connected to V9.
I was disappointed in the audio
level from V9. Shorting its cathode resistor improved the level,
but it was still really too weak to comfortably hear a test signal.
Connecting a long wire to the aerial socket brought in a few
medium wave broadcasts but again the audio level was much like
that from a crystal set so there's more work to be done. I have
a suspicion that the volume control (one of the pair coupled
by gearwheels) is faulty, but even so, shorting the input to
output didn't change the audio level. During tests I found the
AVC voltage responded to changes in test signals, shifting by
several volts as the input level was raised.
I'd noticed one or two valves
weren't seating properly. This includes the mixer so I decided
to change the holder and even when this had been removed it was
impossible to fully plug in the 6K8 into the holder. I fitted
a new standard black composite IO base, but before refitting
the wires and components I tested the Sprague condenser C4 which
decouples the screen of V1. This is marked 0.1uF x 500 volts
and when fed with 350 volts via a limiting resistor of 2.2Kohm
I measured only 0.03 volts across the resistor. This equates
to a leakage of only 14uA or a condenser resistance (=leak) of
25Mohms, infinitely better than the wax condensers.
Looking at the circuit diagram,
in particular the volume control. This is rather unusual because
of course it comprises two ganged controls, but also VR4 does
not adjust the audio level from the earlier stages, but instead
reduces the value of the grid leak from about 500Kohm to zero
and at the same time allows more feedback at higher audio frequencies
(because of C35 being only 0.001uF) to influence the output from
V9. As VR4 is reduced in value so the value of VR3 is increased.
I suspect either VR3 or VR4 (or both) may be open circuit, and
that being so, any small leak in C52 might drive V9 grid positive
to the extent the valve cannot properly amplify a weak signal.
An easy enough point to check by measuring the voltage at the
top cap of V9. The list of jobs is steadily growing, as is the
list of lift repairs in the build up to Christmas! |
|
I tackled the pretty awkward job
of removing the standoffs which brought the mixer below chassis
level. This was probably a retro-fit in manufacturing because
the magic eye was in the way of the mixer valve. Dropping the
6K8 by a couple of inches sorted the problem, but another then
showed up ie. it was very difficult to insert the valve because
there was only a tiny clearance between the glass and the original
mounting hole for the valveholder. I didn't want to risk breaking
a valve and cutting myself so I bought a metal 6K8 which is shorter
then refitted the valveholder direct to the chassis. Fortunately
the critical RF connections didn't need extending but I had to
use longer wires for cathode, anode and screen connections because
these tie the valvebase to the adjacent tagboard on which are
mounted the various resistors. The job was successful and the
new 6K8 managed to oscillate right across the medium waveband
(or at least from end to end of the dial) plus the adjacent shortwave
band and 50% of the next. Still no oscillation on long waves
or the highest frequency band.
There might be a problem or two with
the wavechange switch and the weird combination of condensers
forming the medium wave padder are definitely providing too low
a value. I checked the tuning range and it measured 1.676MHz
to 2.01MHz instead of the correct range of circa 1.00 MHz to
1.97MHz. A rough calculation gives the padder to be around 160pF
instead of the Wearite value of 450pF. The long wave padder should
be about 150pF. I then found the combination of capacitors were
missing a connection to the medium wave coil (this had broken
off when the top of the coil had been bashed). Once I'd put the
padder wire back in place I was able to tune down to around 550KHz
but found the oscillator packed up before getting past 1.5MHz
(it needs get up to about 2MHz). I tried everything.. changing
resistors, capacitors and tweaking trimmers but with no success.
Thinking that damp may be affecting the Q of the coil, I heated
up the area with a hair drier. The amplitude of the oscillator
at 1.3MHz rose from 8 volts to 12 volts pretty quickly then started
to go down again. Removing the heat had improved the amplitude
of the oscillator but it still refused to get higher than 1.5MHz.
At this point long waves had stubbornly remained oscillation
free, SW1 had worked OK and SW2 and SW3 refused to oscillate.
Raising the HT voltage and shorting the 6K8 cathode resistor
and even disconnection the oscillator grid leak all improved
the oscillator amplitude but failed to provide oscillation over
the whole tuning range.
To give me a rest from struggling with
the front end I again looked at the IF strip. Previously I'd
found some trimmers hadn't peaked. Injecting 1000mV of RF at
465KHz into the aerial socket provided enough leakage to drive
the IF amplifiers and the first two IFTs tuned nicely. Adjusting
the third proved there was a problem. By now I could reduce the
input to only 10mV the 2nd IF amplifier was now dealing with
several volts of RF and as the screening cans were not fitted
and I was using unmetallised valves of course led to instability.
The IF signal rose slightly in amplitude and then proved to be
untunable. The MC valve cans are rather odd, being aluminium
cylinders having a flange allowing them to be screwed to the
chassis. All well and good except the valveholders are extremely
tight which makes valve insertion difficult and valve extraction
leading to loose glass envelopes. The simple solution was to
wrap baco-foil around V5, V7 and V7, connecting pin1 on each
valve to a wire and wrapping this around the base/glass junction.
This solved the problem of instability. Most of the trimmers
peaked their coils, but another problem surfaced. There are two
types of AVC. The QAVC system can be switched off but standard
AVC can not and, because its amplified AVC it interferes with
alignment. There are two options which I'll consider when I complete
IF alignment... first I can ground the AVC line and secondly,
reduce the level of the input signal. Before leaving IF setup
I'll cover an annoying fault which is some sort of instability
in the AVC circuitry causing the IF signal to vary intermittently
by a factor of maybe five. I should perhaps investigate the two
Westectors and if these are acting up swap each for a germanium
or silicon diode.
Now back to the local oscillator problem.... |
 |
Lack of oscillation on the long
waveband turned out to be a damaged coil. It's a Wearite PO1.
I found the problem by checking coil
continuity.
At some time the receiver had been placed
on something that had bent under chassis parts. The Wearite coils
cannot be mistreated and in this example tab A had been bent
downwards with sufficient force to pull clip B from its securing
slot and the thin 40SWG wire C soldered to the opposite end of
the tab had broken. Thankfully I was able to solder it back in
place.
I then measured the inductances. The
primary or tuning coil was 392.8uH and the feedback coil 231.5uH.
From the chart above the primary is reckoned to be 390uH so the
coil is only 0.7% high in value. |
|
|
Before I refitted the long wave
coil I checked the medium wave coil. Now this of course works
over part of the band so must be basically OK. Wrong! the medium
wave coil also had an open circuit feedback coil. This one however
is rather odd. Instead of measuring its inductance once I'd resoldered
the broken wire (again close to the solder tag so was easy to
fix) I found the tuning coil measured 88uH and 4.2 ohms, but
the repaired feedback coil measured 66 ohms which was too high
for my LCR meter to check its inductance. I have heard of adding
resistance to tame the oscillator, but this is the first time
I've met it in practice. Did I mention removing the coils? Each
of these was secured by a 6BA screw whose head was hidden under
the tuning condenser for the LW coil and under the rear panel
of the slow motion drive, but luck was on my side as the two
mounting plates in the coils were free enough for me to unscrew
them. Before refitting I added a star washer and 6BA nut to each
screw enabling the coils to be screwed back in place (adding
a spacing washer to bring the top contacts into the correct orientation).
After replacing the wiring and the padders
(I temporarily used a 470pF padder for medium waves) but before
fitting the trimmers I turned on the power. To my surprise the
6K8 started oscillating on long waves as the HT passed about
30 volts and continued to rise in amplitude as the HT settled
on 250 volts. I tried medium wave and SW1. Both worked perfectly.
I've supplied a table below to show the oscillator output. I
used a x10 probe at the grid condenser and the trimmers are 3-65pF.
I'm using a modern oscilloscope which displays, not only traces,
but also their frequency and amplitude. |
Initial
tuning test results
|
No trimmers fitted |
Max Frequency |
Tunes |
Wavelength |
Volts RMS |
Min Frequency |
Tunes |
Wavelength |
Volts RMS |
|
Long Wave |
952KHz |
487KHz |
616m |
15.7 |
605KHz |
140KHz |
2142m |
13.3 |
|
Medium Wave |
2332KHz |
1867KHz |
160m |
11.3 |
1040KHz |
575KHz |
521m |
16.6 |
|
Trimmers fitted max C |
Max Frequency |
Tunes |
Wavelength |
Volts RMS |
Min Frequency |
Tunes |
Wavelength |
Volts RMS |
|
Long Wave |
700KHz |
235KHz |
1276m |
13 |
506KHz |
41KHz |
7317m |
15.1 |
|
Medium Wave |
1700KHz |
1235KHz |
243m |
11.5 |
940KHz |
475KHz |
631m |
15.6 |
|
Short Wave 1 |
9.7MHz |
9.23MHz |
32m |
4.9 |
3.1MHz |
2.63MHz |
114m |
4.3 |
|
|
I tuned the dial so that the display
on my oscilloscope read 198KHz + 465KHz = 663KHz and connected
an aerial and there was Radio 4 on 198KHz. Certainly not loud
and clear, because the audio stages are not yet fixed, but as
clear as a bell.. tuning higher I heard the usual broadcasts
and then BIA, or local airport beacon. Medium waves were full
of stations all too faint to hear properly so now the next stage...
sort out those weird audio stages. I'll postpone alignment until
I can hear what I'm doing and drive my audio wattmeter from demodulated
AM. Later I'll use my spectrum analyser to help align all the
various bandwidth settings.
Before closing and proceeding to check
the audio stages I decided to solve the problem of a jittery
display when looking at the IF signal waveforms. It's quite possible,
because the receiver uses amplified AVC as well as their novel
QAVC that the jitteryness is caused by a component within those
circuits. The drivers for them are a pair of Westectors X1 and
X2 located within IFT4. These are marked with a red end and look
original so there's every chance they are at least the correct
way round.
Turning to QAVC (with no signal tuned)
and looking at X1 we see that its cathode voltage is positive
and defined by V8 cathode current (if QAVC is operative at S1/1).
Let's say V8 anode current is 10mA and screen current 2mA (from
the 6B8 characteristics with grid voltage at minus 3 volts).
The voltage across R23 is then made up from 12mA from V8 plus
whatever current V6 is drawing (because V6 shares V8's cathode
resistor). Let's say V6 is drawing 11mA (assuming its grid is
also minus 3 volts). R23 voltage is therefore about 8 volts.
But I set V8s grid at minus 3 and now its minus 8 so V8 anode
current will be less because its more cut off and this will better
define R23 voltage (which will be less). What actually happens
is that V8 and to some extent V6 will quickly attain a steady
state and define the action of QAVC. In fact the purpose of QAVC
is to reduce the overall receiver gain when no broadcast is tuned.
VR5 allows the QAVC action to be preset.
Once a signal is tuned X1 will suddenly
find that its rectifying properties have overcome the reverse
bias at the junction of R55 and R56 (decoupled to DC by C39).
The cathode of X1 begins to rise in a positive direction as the
signal is tuned in and reduces the reverse bias to V8 whose anode
current increases. This increases the voltage across R23 and
a new steady state is rapidly attained. This by itself is not
the end of the story however, because also acting to control
overall gain is standard AVC action via Westector X2. The job
of normal AVC is to increase overall receiver gain when there
isn't anything tuned in (in fact quite the opposite of QAVC).
In this receiver the two feedback systems are interlinked through
a network of resistors and these together with the action of
X2 will actually define the steady state for no-signal, tuning
into a broadcast and once tuned, the steady state for a tuned
broadcast. That jitteryness I'm trying to pin down is therefore
quite likely to be oscillation within the QAVC/AVC system caused
by a bad smoothing condenser, bad resistor or even a dry solder
joint. As an example, AC at V8 grid from a bad C39 may result
in instability caused by modulation from a test tone.
Looking at X2 which is the standard
AVC detector you can see the cathode (marked red) is connected
to a fixed potentiometer comprising R49 and R50 which together
define a potential of 8 volts given an HT rail of 250 volts (note
that the voltage is not supplied by the voltage stabiliser).
This positive voltage will cut off the Westector until 8 volts
is produced from the RF voltage appearing at IFT4 secondary.
This is generally known as "Delayed AGC". So superimposed
in the overall steady state I mentioned previously is what happens
at X2 which will only conduct once its anode sees an RF signal
capable of being rectified into a voltage in excess of that at
the junction of R49/R50. Yet again, this isn't the whole story
because X2 anode is connected, not only to the anode of V7 via
a DC blocking condenser, but also into the QAVC circuit driven
by V8. That means the whole network of resistors and condensers
looking after gain is governed by the setting of RV5.
What about audio recovery from the broadcast
signal? You'll notice that even the detector for this (V8's diodes)
is linked into the QAVC/AVC system. Firstly because the diodes
within V8 are governed by V8's cathode voltage and secondly via
R82. In this circuit we also have a smoothing condenser C60.
I need to check this area because the RF output from 500pF at
V7 anode appears to be shunted to ground by C60. This is a fixed
potentiometer of 0.5nF and 50nF resulting in only 1% of RF reaching
X2 so surely not right?
At the moment it's all slightly
academic because I removed X1 and X2 and found both seem to be
open-circuit!
I've split off audio section
commissioning to another page (see below) but as that exercise
proceeds I'm finding the odd problem with the RF area, for example
the trimmers across some of the coils have too low a maximum
value to peak signals. Easily remedied by adding small fixed
capacitors. During RF testing I had trouble peaking the coils
in the RF stages. The receiver has very potent AVC and, as I
discovered later, very potent audio compression. As you align
the RF coils the combined action of these two features is to
defeat any attempt to peak the RF coils. You could see these
auto-gain effects when rapidly twiddling trimmers. As the tuning
of the RF coil passed through resonance the audio would suddenly
get louder then within a second or two drop back. As I explain
on the audio page a spectrum analyser might reveal all?
There are two groups of curves
below from Setting 1-6.. First the QAVC responses and secondly
the response curves for the receiver proper.
See the
Receive curves
|
BANDWIDTH SWITCH SETTING |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
BANDWIDTH IN Kc/s |
5 |
8 |
11 |
15 |
18 |
TRF |
And here are the IF curves using
a tracking generator set to 465KHz at a level of -20dB fed into
the receiver aerial socket, so considerable losses before reaching
the first IF amplifier. Note that the signal is monitored
at the anode of the QAVC detector diode X1. The peak of the
first curve (marker 1) was adjusted to be exactly 465KHz at a
bandwidth setting at the minimum of 5KHz and then successive
IFTs were adjusted to keep the peak at 465KHz. Marker 2 was set
at the peak before making adjustments. No effort was made to
adjust the curves to the widths marked on the bandwidth knob
as I guess the QAVC response should be sharper than that for
recovered audio. Curve 2, 3, 4 and 5 are the curves at wider
settings with the final picture showing the response at the TRF
position of the bandwidth knob. The distance between marker 1
& 2 doesn't appreciably get any wider but the IF output drops
as the bandwidth is increased. Horizontal grid setting in each
picture is 20KHz per division so the 3dB points for curve 1 are
about 16KHz apart, curve 2 about 20KHz, but the others are less
wide with TRF having sharpest response. |
|
|
|
Below are a couple of
curves showing the 465KHz IF response to Radio 4 on 198KHz. I
used 3 markers with 2 and 3 at 5KHz either side of 465KHz making
the width of the first response to be 10KHz at 50dB down. Each
horizontal division is 10KHz. The second curve shows Radio 4
at the TRF setting with horizontal divisions at 50KHz making
the response about 10KHz at 20dB down. Note that all these curves
show the response of the receiver for the QAVC control signal
and not the response for audio detection. Read
the AVC Page which explains the AVC system |
|
|
|
And now the curves for
received signals. The tracking generator was set to 0dBm and
connected to the aerial input with the receiver set to 200KHz
long waves. The TRF curve is not shown,but instead I repeated
the widest bandwith setting with QAVC off. In this group of pictures
I set Marker 1 to 465KHz and Marker 2 and 3 to roughly 3dB down
from Marker 1 for pictures 4-6 and for pictures 1- 3 at +/- 10KHz
from 465KHz. The span is 50KHz so each division represents 5KHz.
To recap: The bandwidths marked
on the knob of the bandwidth switch is my only source of information
and it's fortunate that this knob is original as, to the best
of my knowledge, no other record exists. |
|
BANDWIDTH SWITCH SETTING |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
BANDWIDTH IN Kc/s |
5 |
8 |
11 |
15 |
18 |
TRF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whilst matching exactly
to the markings on the knob the results shown above are a lot
different to the QAVC curves and indicate that the adjustable
IF tuning is working tolerably well. After testing I noticed
the audio from Radio 4 Long Waves on the 5KHz setting sounded
muffled, I suspect one of the wafers of the bandwidth switch
selecting audio filter components was wired to a faulty part.
Having tuned the IFTs to peak at V8 diodes I was able to hear
all the normal long wave stations. A bonus was that VR5 can now
be adjusted to set the quieting level as with it set to minimum
quieting I can now hear background noise when not tuned to a
broadcast. |
|
The long waveband is now fully
operational and all the usual broadcasts are audible at good
strength but the RF coils don't seem to peak up. This might be
due to too much overall gain. Unlike usual receivers, whose coils
and capacitors can be adjusted for best tracking, the coils on
the lowest three bands have no dust cores. I also checked medium
waves and again the whole band tunes nicely. The padder is a
substitute and a little high in value so the tuned band is larger
than the dial markings so that needs some sorting out before
final alignment. The lowest frequency shortwave band fully tunes
but the highest two need sorting out as their local oscillator
cuts out at as frequency rises with the tuning condenser at half
mesh. These coils use slugs so it may be that these have degraded?
After another session checking over
the receiver, but now armed with a new can of switch cleaner,
I found that the two tuning condensers are not wired in parallel
for the longer wavelengths but used individually. I noticed that
the local oscillator on the two higher frequency bands stopped
at exactly the same point on the dial as I tuned to about half
scale, and of course the reason was obvious... a bent vane on
the smaller tuning condenser. After carefully bending it straight
the receiver worked on all bands across the whole dial. Next,
I looked at the mechanical parts of the tuning condensers. These,
like all of this type of tuning condenser design, rely on perfect
earthing between the moving vanes and the metal frame. Because
of general corrosion these moving parts looked a bit dodgy and
tuning a station and rocking the tuning condenser back and forth
showed changes in volume which lessened as I applied switch cleaner.
I then noticed the screws holding in place the tuning condenser
to the chassis were moving as the tuning knob was pushed. In
addition, the tuning control shaft passes through a bush secured
to a bracket screwed to the chassis, and both the screws holding
the bracket were loose allowing movement of the tuning condenser
when tuning. Most of the eight screws securing the two tuning
condensers to the chassis were loose and all looked rusty. Again,
the volume of a received station changed as the tuning condenser
was rocked but lessened as the mounting screws were turned. Ideally
the tuning condenser frame should be soldered to the chassis
using copper braid. The high resistance between the moving parts
clearly accounts for weaker than expected reception and explains
why the various RF coils didn't cleanly peak up as their trimmers
were adjusted. Once the switch cleaner has finished its job I'll
repeat alignment. As far as tightening screws is concerned...
not an easy job because of the position of their nuts buried
in the coil pack and wiring, and the nuts, like all used in this
receiver are 4BA locknuts.
After cleaning up the poor chassis connections
and the poor tuning condenser parts I found I could now hear
stations with the bandwidth switch selecting the TRF receiver.
Because the set is designed to feed
an external amplifier and produces only a low level audio output,
which is damped somewhat by low impedance headphones, it will
be a good idea during further testing, to use a small audio amplifier
and loudspeaker. Later, I connected the workshop audio amplifier
to the receiver and the results were really good. Everything
now works but I'm not sure about RF alignment. It's difficult
to check image reception because of the vagueness of the dial
which is designed to give the user the location of broadcasts
rather than exact frequency settings. To complete the alignment
requires a chart to supply dial settings as my signal generator
doesn't use wavelengths. The number of degrees is the angle from
the dial end to the first calibration mark with 90 degrees for
a vertical pointer. |
|
RANGE |
DEGREES |
METRES |
KHZ |
|
RANGE |
DEGREES |
METRES |
KHZ |
|
RANGE |
DEGREES |
METRES |
KHZ |
|
1 |
12 |
800 |
375 |
|
1 |
90 |
1265 |
237 |
|
1 |
20 |
2000 |
150 |
|
2 |
12 |
200 |
1500 |
|
2 |
90 |
360 |
833 |
|
2 |
12 |
560 |
536 |
|
3 |
35 |
40 |
7500 |
|
3 |
90 |
66 |
4545 |
|
3 |
15 |
100 |
3000 |
|
4 |
35 |
20 |
15000 |
|
4 |
90 |
28.1 |
10676 |
|
4 |
20 |
34 |
8840 |
|
5 |
28 |
10 |
30000 |
|
5 |
90 |
13.9 |
21583 |
|
5 |
25 |
17 |
17600 |
|
 |
|
Because the IF of the
Moreton Cheyney is only 465KHz, image reception is a problem
on the shortwave bands, particularly because of the wide bandwidth
of the IF tuning. Images are only twice the IF, or 930KHz away
from the desired signal. See the table
above.
Unlike most receivers which
have a standard alignment procedure: which is to adjust trimmers
at the high frequency band end and dust cores at the low end,
the MC has very few dust cores. For long and medium waves a pair
of trimmers are provided which are wired in parallel with the
local oscillator padding condensers. This is not typical but
allows the total tuning range for these wavebands to be set higher
or lower to match the dial markings. For the shortwave bands
the oscillator coils are fitted with dust cores, although these
are not readily accessible for the two upper ranges. The RF stages
are not provided with dust cores so that alignment needs to be
averaged out... not ideal, bearing in mind the poor image response
in the shortwave bands, although for the general listener.. whether
they're listening to an image is really academic. |
|
|
|
As the receiver is not easy to align
using loudspeaker output voltage because of its potent AGC I
decided to check the RF front end with my spectrum analyser.
The effect of AGC is not eliminated because the RF amplifier
is a variable mu valve supplied with AGC voltage but decent responses
were noted. Pictures will be supplied later. The classic response
was achieved showing the tuning response at different dial settings,
together with the relative local oscillator voltage. To my surprise
the RF tuning was fairly sharp. Because of the overall AGC action
this sharpness hadn't been apparent whilst monitoring the audio
output. A really annoying problem is the omission of two-speed
tuning and I'll need to swap the knob for one having a peg to
allow it to be turned continuously. Looking at the dial you'll
note the range is short of 180 degrees, being something like
155 degrees, although the tuning condenser does cover its full
sweep of 180 degrees. The squashed shape of the dial means the
pointer protrudes somewhat as it moves over the middle part of
the dial so it gets in the way when the receiver is upended on
the bench. The first attempt at checking the medium waveband
gave me a tuning range for the RF amplifiers (not the local oscillator)
of 543 to 1497KHz. The proper range should be about 538 to 1500KHz.
The implication is I need to raise the response by only 3KHz
but the LF band end will be a little on the high side at 546KHz
instead of the theoretical 538KHz. A small amount of dust core
in the coils might help if the correct coverage is needed. The
use of the specrtum analyser makes this a simple proposition. |
|
I spent an afternoon experimenting
with the receiver and discovered a number of basic problems.
The coils for long, medium and first shortwave bands are difficult
to align with the dial markings and I suspect that it is virtually
impossible to track the local oscillator to the dial calibrations.
It seems also impossible to align the RF amplifiers. Because
of the large amount of gain it may not be too important, other
than undue sensitivity to images. It's quite llikely that the
dial was marked up from a prototype receiver and little by way
of adjustment carried out in the factory except perhaps to check
the dial settings for the major British stations such as Droitwich.
Oddly, when scrutinising dial markings I noticed two different
markings included 15Mc/s, these being 20m and 30m. The later
of course should have been marked 10Mc/s. The local oscillator
was so far out on some bands I needed to use a portable receiver
to identify the local oscillator frequency. As an example, with
the dial set at 60m or 5Mc/s the local oscillator coil could
be tuned by its dust core from 4.8 to 5.1MHz. The correct frequency
should have been either 5+0.465MHz=5.465MHz or 5-0.465MHz=4.535MHz
so it seems impossble to set the local oscillator to either frequency.
In fact the dial markings appear to show the local oscillator
frequency. A solution would be to add a small trimmer capacitor
across the coil to then permit the local oscillator to track
below the RF tuning. At the 5Mc/s marking the oscillator could
be tuned to 4.535MHz.
The two highest bands are very difficult
to adjust because of the positioning of the coils, but when I
checked, the local oscillator frequencies at various dial settings
seemed to be approximately OK.
I was able to roughly adjust the longwave
dial settings by setting the Irish station on 252KHz to just
below 1200 metres. Because of the very wide IF response combined
with high overall gain and potent AVC tuning is exceedingly broad
for the strongest broadcasts. Medium waves also were not too
far from their markings accommodating a range of 1600Kc/s to
about 550Kc/s, although dial readings are rather vague at their
ends. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|